There is no helpdesk, no designated window, no single official in the High Court to guide a party-in-person through the maze of procedural formalities. What ought to be a temple of justice feels instead like a fortress—closed off, intimidating, and indifferent. The basic right to be heard becomes a cruel struggle when even the first step
There is no helpdesk, no designated window, no single official in the High Court to guide a party-in-person through the maze of procedural formalities. What ought to be a temple of justice feels instead like a fortress—closed off, intimidating, and indifferent. The basic right to be heard becomes a cruel struggle when even the first step is cloaked in silence. For someone already carrying the burden of injustice, the lack of guidance is not just neglect—it is a denial of justice itself.
Unlike the Supreme Court, where self-represented litigants are often given space to speak freely, few judges in the Himachal High Court extend the same courtesy. Many expect them to act like trained lawyers, overlooking the fact that in-person litigants usually appear out of urgency, conviction, or necessity—not choice